Discover Trending Search Saved Menu
The Dead Zone
The Dead Zone — In his mind, he has the power to see the future. In his hands, he has the power to change it.
1983 7 19.2K R views saved
Active recipe:

The Dead Zone

1983 7 19.2K R views saved
The Dead Zone

Johnny Smith is a schoolteacher with his whole life ahead of him but, after leaving his fiancee's home one night, is involved in a car crash which leaves him in a coma for 5 years. When he wakes, he discovers he has an ability to see into the past, present and future life of anyone with whom he comes into physical contact.

Countries: US
Languages: English, Russian
Content Rating: R
Runtime: 1hrs 43min
Status: Released
Release date: 1983-10-21
Release format: Streaming — Dec 22, 2008
Comments
whitsbrain
@whitsbrain 3 years ago

As a fan of Stephen King and Christopher Walken, the fact that this movie eluded me is surprising. It's probably because psychic abilities are not the least bit appealing to me. This was sitting in my Amazon queue, about to disappear in a few days, so I watched it and experienced the primary reason why I watch movies.

This is tight and suspenseful and very well-acted (except for one character which I'll touch on shortly). The opening scene that establishes the relationship between Johnny (Walken) and Sarah (Brooke Adams) is pedestrian but purposeful and Johnny's awakening from a coma is tastefully played out. But Johnny's first psychic event is stunning and kind of snaps you awake with him.

I really admire the way this movie establishes Johnny's powers and how events slowly reveal to him his "dead zone". There are several stories within a story here, and I kept thinking about where this movie was going. With the introduction of a crooked politician named Greg Stillson (played by Martin Sheen), the movie's destination slowly comes into view. And speaking of Martin Sheen...even though his character is pivotal to the fate of Johnny and the scale by which this story climbs with Stillson's own ascension, I can't stand the way Sheen plays this. Sheen is bombastic, slimy and generally a cliched version of Hollywood's take on politicians. I'm not defending politicians here, but I am disappointed in the portrayal within this otherwise excellent film.

Even though Sheen's Stillson is over-the-top and practically cartoonish, he can't extinguish the amazing final act. It's a very satisfying conclusion and worth noting again that this movie hurtles Johnny from saving lives in a small town to saving...well, let's just say something larger.

Cronenberg avoids all of his typical weird body-horror here, and instead offers up a taut thriller that you should watch as soon as possible.

3
whitsbrain
@whitsbrain 3 years ago

As a fan of Stephen King and Christopher Walken, the fact that this movie eluded me is surprising. It's probably because psychic abilities are not the least bit appealing to me. This was sitting in my Amazon queue, about to disappear in a few days, so I watched it and experienced the primary reason why I watch movies.

This is tight and suspenseful and very well-acted (except for one character which I'll touch on shortly). The opening scene that establishes the relationship between Johnny (Walken) and Sarah (Brooke Adams) is pedestrian but purposeful and Johnny's awakening from a coma is tastefully played out. But Johnny's first psychic event is stunning and kind of snaps you awake with him.

I really admire the way this movie establishes Johnny's powers and how events slowly reveal to him his "dead zone". There are several stories within a story here, and I kept thinking about where this movie was going. With the introduction of a crooked politician named Greg Stillson (played by Martin Sheen), the movie's destination slowly comes into view. And speaking of Martin Sheen...even though his character is pivotal to the fate of Johnny and the scale by which this story climbs with Stillson's own ascension, I can't stand the way Sheen plays this. Sheen is bombastic, slimy and generally a cliched version of Hollywood's take on politicians. I'm not defending politicians here, but I am disappointed in the portrayal within this otherwise excellent film.

Even though Sheen's Stillson is over-the-top and practically cartoonish, he can't extinguish the amazing final act. It's a very satisfying conclusion and worth noting again that this movie hurtles Johnny from saving lives in a small town to saving...well, let's just say something larger.

Cronenberg avoids all of his typical weird body-horror here, and instead offers up a taut thriller that you should watch as soon as possible.

3
Jacob
@walrus-master 8 years ago

The acting in this one is a little wonky at times but it still does the job. Not Croneberg's best film, but it's still enjoyable and has an interesting plot.

3
Caesar
@csrz 3 years ago

I really enjoyed this one! Very odd, bleak, and intriguing. It doesn’t have typical Cronenberg horror elements but it feels very grounded and still mantains the usual brooding atmosphere found in his films. It's less about the narrative and more about the arc of the lead character. Christopher Walken delivers heartbreaking performance as a man who discovers his new psychic ability and uses it to help people, he's just easy to route for.

1
Spiritualized Kaos
@spiritualized-kaos 1 year ago

Looking into the future, it prevents the end of humanity. Disturbing

0
CinemanicBonkers
@cinemanicbonkers 6 years ago

I enjoyed this film, a good early one from walken and I bet it would of been even better back in the 80s.

1
Eliezer
@eliezladeira 4 years ago

Good adaptation, somewhat improbable story but if the person embarks without questioning too much, you can enjoy the film well. [spoiler]End with a good turnaround and with a happy ending, the other way around.[/spoiler]

0
peteo
@peteo 3 years ago

Interesting to see some of these now famous actors when they were young
Nice premise, as has aged ok, but ultimately unsatisfying

0
The_Argentinian
@the-argentinian 3 years ago

The politics of this movie are highly relevant in this day and age

3
Travis Goldman
@tcg37 5 months ago

amazing how relevant this is still in 2025. unfortunately, even using a baby as a shield wouldn't dissuade some voters nowadays.

1
RichNice
@richnice35 2 years ago

Watched this with the family... very definition of a good bad movie. Decent acting, sometimes cheesy dialogue but good overall.

0
Recommendations
two-tone-background No results found! Please adjust your filters or try again.