Jungle Book

I was really impressed by the 1942 adaptation of "Jungle Book." Its vibrant use of color and visual style make it a standout film, offering a unique and artistic take on the classic story.

This version has a distinct charm, different from the 1994 and 2016 adaptations, as well as the beloved 1967 animated film. The way it portrays the animal characters is particularly noteworthy, showcasing impressive craftsmanship and creativity.

The focus on the human characters adds an interesting dimension to the story, and the performances by Sabu (Mowgli) and Joseph Calleia (Buldeo) each bring their own special touch to the film. The casting and make-up choices reflect the era’s vision and add a fascinating historical element.

Overall, while this adaptation offers a different perspective from others, it has its own unique appeal and is a valuable addition to the collection of "Jungle Book" films.

9/10

I didn't find entertainment watching this 'Jungle Book'. I will say, as many others have, colour-wise it looks real neat.

I'm admittedly not a huge fan of any adaptation of this classic story yet, though do thoroughly enjoy the 1994 and 2016 versions; as well as liking the 1967 animated attempt, of course. This 1942 film is my least favourite so far.

The way it is all told didn't interest me all that much. The stuff with the animals looks - welfare concerns aside - good, but what hampers it most in my opinion is that it puts heavy focus on the humans. I didn't feel satisfied watching any of the onscreen talent. The performances of Sabu (Mowgli), Joseph Calleia (Buldeo) & Co. didn't do anything for me. There's also, as you might expect, inappropriate casting/make-up.

It's not a terrible film, just one of those that drags as it never excites or intrigues - for me, at least.