Discover Trending Search Saved Menu
San Andreas
San Andreas — We always knew this day would come.
2015 6 79.0K PG-13 views saved
Active recipe:

San Andreas

2015 6 79.0K PG-13 views saved
San Andreas

In the aftermath of a massive earthquake in California, a rescue-chopper pilot makes a dangerous journey across the state in order to rescue his estranged daughter.

Countries: US
Languages: English
Content Rating: PG-13
Runtime: 1hrs 54min
Status: Released
Release date: 2015-05-27
Release format: Streaming — Oct 08, 2015
Comments
Just Another Movie Nerd
@pjonsson 9 years ago

This is a classical Hollywood movie, thin plot and a lot of effects. However, this time, I quite liked it. Actually I liked it a lot. The plot, although thin, is not altogether bad, it holds together even though are quite a few unbelievable moments. However, put in the context of a traditional disaster movie, it is not bad.. Maybe this is what I like about the movie. It is really a good old fashioned disaster movie.

When I first read the blurb about this movie I was afraid that it was going to be a big apocalypse at the beginning and then it was going to be a “slow” search for Ray’s daughter. It is nothing of the kind. It has a decent build up of suspense up to quite a few more or less spectacular earth quake scenes … and then it continues. I was pretty happy that there was a decent build up from the start but I was even more happy that the initial earth wrecking event was actually not the big event.

As I wrote at the beginning, the plot is pretty thin. The special effects are not however. At least, I liked them. Not surprisingly houses a are falling over like there was no tomorrow (which for a lot of people there are not) but it is done quite well. I also liked the scenes where the earth wobbles when Ray and his wife flies over it in his chopper. I found that quite cool. There are a few moments that are, well let us say not too well thought through. For instance the classical collapsing building that collapses in the just the right pace for the heroes to do there job. The we have when Ray and his wife speeds through the waters of Los Angeles after the quake, which are riddled with trash. The amount of trash in the water would have rendered their propeller useless after a few hundred meters. But then, I think I am too much of an engineer now.

Speaking of Ray’s wife. That was one of the things I really did not like with the movie. Maybe the movie directors and actors in Hollywood are so used to divorcing all the time that they think it is a “standard” plot element and do not think twice about it but for us other “ordinary” people it is a tragedy (especially people outside of the US apparently if one should go by the trash that is spewed out from Hollywood all the time) and I really do not want to watch that crap all the time in movies and TV-shows! I was actually tempted to downgrade the movie at last a star, even two, for that crap but what the heck, it is a good movie and I do like “The Rock”.

So after, after that little outburst, I have to say that I this one was a really enjoyable movie. One of the few lately that I have watched. It is a quite good, classical, disaster movie with a good build up, really good effects and a good and happy ending (for the main characters at last) and I am a sucker for happy endings.

5
Just Another Movie Nerd
@pjonsson 9 years ago

This is a classical Hollywood movie, thin plot and a lot of effects. However, this time, I quite liked it. Actually I liked it a lot. The plot, although thin, is not altogether bad, it holds together even though are quite a few unbelievable moments. However, put in the context of a traditional disaster movie, it is not bad.. Maybe this is what I like about the movie. It is really a good old fashioned disaster movie.

When I first read the blurb about this movie I was afraid that it was going to be a big apocalypse at the beginning and then it was going to be a “slow” search for Ray’s daughter. It is nothing of the kind. It has a decent build up of suspense up to quite a few more or less spectacular earth quake scenes … and then it continues. I was pretty happy that there was a decent build up from the start but I was even more happy that the initial earth wrecking event was actually not the big event.

As I wrote at the beginning, the plot is pretty thin. The special effects are not however. At least, I liked them. Not surprisingly houses a are falling over like there was no tomorrow (which for a lot of people there are not) but it is done quite well. I also liked the scenes where the earth wobbles when Ray and his wife flies over it in his chopper. I found that quite cool. There are a few moments that are, well let us say not too well thought through. For instance the classical collapsing building that collapses in the just the right pace for the heroes to do there job. The we have when Ray and his wife speeds through the waters of Los Angeles after the quake, which are riddled with trash. The amount of trash in the water would have rendered their propeller useless after a few hundred meters. But then, I think I am too much of an engineer now.

Speaking of Ray’s wife. That was one of the things I really did not like with the movie. Maybe the movie directors and actors in Hollywood are so used to divorcing all the time that they think it is a “standard” plot element and do not think twice about it but for us other “ordinary” people it is a tragedy (especially people outside of the US apparently if one should go by the trash that is spewed out from Hollywood all the time) and I really do not want to watch that crap all the time in movies and TV-shows! I was actually tempted to downgrade the movie at last a star, even two, for that crap but what the heck, it is a good movie and I do like “The Rock”.

So after, after that little outburst, I have to say that I this one was a really enjoyable movie. One of the few lately that I have watched. It is a quite good, classical, disaster movie with a good build up, really good effects and a good and happy ending (for the main characters at last) and I am a sucker for happy endings.

5
ᴍɪss ʙʟᴀᴄᴋʜᴏᴏᴅ
@tenebriafelix 4 years ago

absolutely loved it, awesome movie and my fav actors Alexandra & Dwayne I just read there will be no San Andreas 2 :( so disappointed

0
Siobhan Beaumont
@siobhanbeaumont85 7 years ago

This was a fantastic movie, although some parts were unrealistic. Great acting and edge of seat parts. Made it into my top 10.

0
lunatee
@lunatee 10 years ago

The CGI team takes the cake on this movie. Outstanding job in the effects department. Unbelievable work!!

1
RiGHT
@right 8 years ago

Ridiculous, unrealistic, bad acting, etc etc....... and still very entertaining :)

1
DONMEGA
@dxdonmega 10 years ago

LOVED It! Such a fun popcorn flick. The Rock is the man!!!

1
Luigi Ravaglia
@r-lewis 10 years ago

The great thing about this movie is that it knows what it is, a mindless destruction flick, and rarely tries to be something more. Most of the effect are great, and the Rock... Is the Rock.

Absolutely recommended if you want to shut down your brain and have a lot of fun.

41
BeardedOneWatches
@beardedonewatches 3 years ago

Most people will probably dislike this movie tremendously. Full of clichés and corny dialogue. Full of CGI-filled over-the-top action scenes. Full of reality defying physics. Check, Check, and Check. Which is why...I like it!!

Disaster movies have become somewhat of a guilty pleasure of mine, and San Andreas really got what it takes. I felt thoroughly entertained for almost two hours, and don't really feel bad about it. ;)

My advice is If you like disaster movies, go watch it. Preferably with a good surround sound system so you can really feel the earth moving. ;)

3
Mister Coldstream
@mrcoldstream 4 years ago

**THE UGLY: SAN ANDREAS**

WRITING: 55
ACTING: 60
LOOK: 65
SOUND: 50
FEEL: 65
NOVELTY: 0
ENJOYMENT: 60
RE-WATCHABILITY: 15
INTRIGUE: 60
EXPECTATIONS: 50

----

**THE GOOD:**

We have seen just about every action hero actor appear in one of these movies, so it was given we’d see The Rock join the group sooner or later. He fits the role just as well as the others, if not better.

I enjoy Paul Giamatti in the typical role of the befuddled scientist trying to convince and warn everyone of impending doom.

The emotional dimension of a father determined to save his daughter to right his past wrongs and the themes explored around that are the only truly rewarding parts of this experience. The climax feels truly emotional and rewarding thanks to this.

----

**THE BAD:**

Another extremely formulaic disaster flick, down to every little plot detail, structure and character type. It makes the plot tiresome to follow and the conclusion predictable.

Alexandra Daddario has the looks but remains a wooden actress. It doesn’t help that she’s forced to play an incredibly clichéd character.

This film loses believability quickly in favour of cheap thrills. Everything is epicly crumbling down following the super earthquake, leaving the entirety of San Francisco in ruin.

When the introduction is done and dusted, we follow three separate groups (the parents, the children and the scientists) who try to survive, find each other and understand what is going on. All three plotlines are roughly handled and don’t go very in-depth into character emotions, but allow for Paul Giamatti to drop some comedic one-liners.

I’m allergic to forced plot devices that have no impact on the story other than to force certain characters into certain situations. The divorce between Ray and Emma is such a forced plot device that goes nowhere.

There is no real chemistry between Johnson and Carla Gugino and the forced love story between Daddario and Hugo Johnstone-Burt is cringeworthy.

----

**THE UGLY:**

Also known as Dwayne Johnson Commandeering Just About Every Vehicle Known to Man: The Movie.

----

**THE VERDICT:**

_San Andreas marks a return of the disaster film in every conceivable way but also packs a surprising emotional punch in the finale._

**48% = ➖ = UGLY**

1
Pedro Gimenez
@pedrogimenezalmeida 9 years ago

Nothing new.
I felt like a fortune teller, knowing everything that is about to happening.
But the visual effects make it a good movie.

1
Recommendations
two-tone-background No results found! Please adjust your filters or try again.