Discover Trending Search Saved Menu
Scream 2
Scream 2 — Someone has taken their love of sequels one step too far.
1997 6.5 284.8K R views saved
Active recipe:

Scream 2

1997 6.5 284.8K R views saved
Scream 2

Two years after the first series of murders, as Sidney Prescott acclimates to college life, someone donning the Ghostface costume begins a new string of killings.

Countries: US
Languages: English
Content Rating: R
Runtime: 2hrs
Status: Released
Release date: 1997-12-12
Release format: Streaming — Oct 30, 2005
Comments
Matheus Moreno
@meiwakuna 13 years ago

Holy crap! Better than the first.

4
Matheus Moreno
@meiwakuna 13 years ago

Holy crap! Better than the first.

4
Corey
@tvtrav3ler 3 years ago

3 Thoughts After Re-Watching ‘Scream 2’:

1. _Scream 2_ is a stellar sequel. Probably my fave sequel of any film _(equal maybe to ‘Batman Returns’)_. It upped the ante in every way Randy detailed, and then some. I would argue that it’s even better than the original.

2. This second entry solidified Sidney Prescott as a bona fide badass. She’s right up there with Ellen Ripley and Sarah Conner — and it needs to be talked about more.

3. There’s a certain choreography to these films that I love. The movement through the school scene with Dewey and Gale kept me on the edge of my seat when I first saw it in the theaters. Epic stuff.

2
Felipe
@heyflp 3 weeks ago

In a world where sequels often trip over their own ambition or just recycle tired formulas, “Scream 2” stands out as one of those rare follow-ups that truly understands both the spirit of the original and the cultural moment it lives in. Wes Craven, once again teaming up with screenwriter Kevin Williamson, isn’t just trying to recreate the magic of the first film—he’s expanding it. If “Scream” redefined the slasher genre by exposing and mocking its clichés with sharp self-awareness, then “Scream 2” does the same with sequels themselves. The meta-commentary isn’t just a gimmick—it’s used as a tool for criticism and reinvention. This movie is both a sequel and a conversation about what a good sequel should be, and the fact that it pulls that off with such energy, biting humor, and thematic intelligence is exactly what makes it feel so relevant even decades later.

The story structure of “Scream 2” is smart in the way it brings back the surviving characters from Woodsboro—now more hardened, still carrying the weight of their past traumas, and caught up in a brand-new mystery. Sidney Prescott, once again played by Neve Campbell with a more introspective and subdued vibe, bears the scars of someone who’s lived through loss after brutal loss. Her arc in this sequel hits harder: she’s no longer just a reactive final girl, but a woman desperately trying to take back control of her own narrative while the world around her seems determined to keep writing her into tragedy. The scene where she performs in a stage play is the perfect example—a surreal, haunting moment that captures her struggle to separate fiction from reality, just as both are crashing down on her with merciless force.

This is also where Wes Craven’s direction really shines. Unlike the almost clinical, stripped-down feel of the first movie, “Scream 2” gives Craven more room to explore emotional textures and space through the camera. The crashed car scene—where Sidney and Hallie (Elise Neal) have to quietly crawl over an unconscious Ghostface—is a masterclass in tension, proof that Craven didn’t need cheap jumpscares to create sheer agony. In another standout moment, Gale (Courteney Cox) is chased through a sound studio by Ghostface, with abrupt cuts and eerie silences that turn the scene into a slow-building panic attack. The score here is especially well-timed and hypnotic, pushing the suspense to a near-operatic level where the tension comes not from screaming, but from the precision of the choreography.

As for the new characters, the movie doesn’t hold back on giving us suspicious, charismatic additions to the cast. Timothy Olyphant is magnetic as the movie-obsessed Mickey, and the return of Liev Schreiber as Cotton Weary is a massive win—his moral ambiguity and emotional volatility keep us guessing constantly. Even Sarah Michelle Gellar’s brief appearance makes an impact, with her early death working almost like a mission statement: no one is safe, and the film knows it. The use of “Stab,” the movie-within-the-movie recreating the events of the first “Scream,” isn’t just clever—it’s essential to the film’s meta tone. It gives the franchise permission to mock itself without deflating the tension, and casting Tori Spelling as Sidney Prescott is exactly the kind of self-aware joke only “Scream” could pull off so effortlessly.

But the real kicker is the climax—so heads up, spoilers ahead. The twist that Mickey wasn’t acting alone is a well-laid narrative punch, but the real surprise is Laurie Metcalf’s reveal as Debbie Salt—or rather, Mrs. Loomis, Billy’s mom. Her performance is both over-the-top and genuinely menacing, dancing on the edge of camp without tipping into parody. The timing of her reveal is perfect, and the underlying theme is brutal: revenge driven by twisted maternal grief, in contrast to Mickey’s obsession with horror movie logic. This is where “Scream 2” does something impressive—it weaves together commentary on media sensationalism and the cyclical nature of violence with motives that, while extreme, still feel rooted in real emotional pain. The original tragedy echoes through this sequel like something unavoidable, a trauma that society, the media, and the slasher genre itself seem doomed to repeat.

All in all, “Scream 2” works not just as a sharp and exciting follow-up, but as a layered reflection on violence, fame, and fiction. It follows the rules while bending them, entertains us while making us question why we love this stuff so much. At a time when second installments in a franchise usually feel like filler or just a setup for the next thing, Craven and Williamson gave us a sequel that stands on its own two feet, all while honoring the original’s DNA. If “Scream” was the dissection of the slasher, then “Scream 2” is the autopsy of the sequel itself—and honestly, very few franchises manage to be this smart, bloody, and self-aware all at once.

0
Vicente
@ivcente 5 years ago

The first one is better? Yeah, but that doesn't mean Scream 2 is bad, quite the opposite, it's amazing!

Sidney is more prepared to face the assassin, although she's not expecting this to happen again. Gale starts again as a greedy bitch but in the end she has a good heart. [spoiler] Randy's character is great, they could've kept him alive more time :( . [/spoiler]

The car accident scene is super tense, it gives the creeps. One of the best of the entire genre.

I liked the metalanguage and the whole conversation about sequels in movie history, and of course, the infamous phone calls.

12
Glitter Princess
@tvmoviequeen 11 years ago

Where most sequels fail to deliver, Scream 2 doesn't disappoint.

9
Kevib
@walkingkev 1 year ago

Amazing sequel, love that they made "Stab", Dewey is such an amazing character.

The reveal / killers aren't as iconic as the first one but overall I love this one nearly as much as the first one.

0
Cory Copeland
@copeland1994 2 years ago

Following up one of the best ever horror movies, this sequel keeps the same feel, great cast, and continues where the first left off! While it can’t possibly reach the heights of the first in an iconic level criteria, it’s damn good.

Rating: 4.5/5 - 9/10 - Highly Recommend

0
Jim222001
@jim222001 9 years ago

Not everything in the movie worked. Like the Jerry O'Connell singing "I think I love you!" scene. Scream 2 at least packs more scares than Scream 3 or 4. While Timothy Olyphant and Jamie Kennedy had pretty good one liners.

5
Lauren Hannah
@laurenhannah 8 years ago

Scream 2: where they suddenly remembered to finally cast some people of color.

3
Demarco Twain
@demarcotwain 3 years ago

Scream 2 is decent but too meta for it’s own good, to the brink of being ridiculous

2
Recommendations
two-tone-background No results found! Please adjust your filters or try again.