Discover Trending Search Saved Menu
Spartacus
Spartacus — They trained him to kill for their pleasure ... but they trained him a little too well
1960 7.5 40.2K PG-13 views saved
Active recipe:

Spartacus

1960 7.5 40.2K PG-13 views saved
Spartacus

The rebellious Thracian Spartacus, born and raised a slave, is sold to Gladiator trainer Batiatus. After weeks of being trained to kill for the arena, Spartacus turns on his owners and leads the other slaves in rebellion. As the rebels move from town to town, their numbers swell as escaped slaves join their ranks. Under the leadership of Spartacus, they make their way to southern Italy, where they will cross the sea and return to their homes.

Countries: US
Languages: English
Content Rating: PG-13
Runtime: 3hrs 17min
Status: Released
Release date: 1960-10-13
Release format: Streaming — Jan 01, 1982
Comments
Chris K
@canuckchris 9 years ago

One of my favorite movies of all time, a must watch for anyone!

4
Chris K
@canuckchris 9 years ago

One of my favorite movies of all time, a must watch for anyone!

4
@finfan 1 year ago

When they say: "they don't make movies like this anymore" - this is the kind of movie they are talking about.


It costs a whooping 12m USD - about 126.5m USD in todays money. However, even for that amount you couldn't make it today like they used to. Over 10000 people were involved. The battle at the end had 8000 people in it. People, not CGI generated objects. The sheer logistics of that is mind blowing. Everything you wanted in the picture had to be build or sought out. The closest to SFX you get is matte-painting. This is why it's called an epic - a monumental movie.


The story ? It's a classic in the truest sense of the word. You can call it cheesy, predictable, flawed if you like. I could understand all that. But that's true for many movies today equally.


The movie is on of the classics you have to watch if you consider yourself an enthusiast in my opinion.


I recommend reading the section with all the background infos over on imdb. It's very interesting.

1
CinemanicBonkers
@cinemanicbonkers 4 years ago

I was impressed, a great 60s picture and definitely a rememberble one too and Kirk Douglas with a super performance. A different ending would of been nice but still good though. I definitely need to get more of his movies watched.

2
@saundrew 9 years ago

I really love the first hour of this (long) movie. Seeing the training and change of the slave gladiators is what I find interesting. Also, you get a lot of time with the owner Lentulus Batiatus, which is simply fantastic. He is so funny and entertaining, that every time he's on screen I am having a great time.

However, this movie is too long. They could cut a good amount from the middle and it would be a lot better. It feels like we skip the battles themselves a lot until the end. This does really knock an otherwise great movie down for me. But hey, Laurence Olivier is in it too. The great overcomes the minor bad in this one.

2
Tony Bates
@soonertbone 8 months ago

I tend not to like Roman epics, and this is quite long. But while it could have been cut substantially without losing effect, this has some interesting bits especially in the first third and last third--the action sequences are well-made and pretty awe-inspiring. The standout performance was Peter Ustinov, who infused Batiatus with so many small, fantastic mannerisms--I couldn't take my eyes off him any time he was on screen. Loved the downer ending.

0
Spiritualized Kaos
@spiritualized-kaos 2 years ago

The story of the famous slave rebellion in Rome.

0
@juliosoft 5 years ago

Pending time and taking advantage of the occasion, we see it. We still like it, as it looks on the big screen. "I am Spartacus. I am Spartacus. I am Spartacus. I am Spartacus. I am Spartacus…"

0
Neal Mahoney
@nmahoney416 7 years ago

It's soooo long but it's pretty good too. Kirk Douglas is fantastic as Spartacus. It is pretty to look at. The costumes and scenery are done very well and look pretty real. The action scenes are all great especially the big one near the end. I just wish this was shorter and didn't drag so much in the middle and didn't have as much roman screentime.

0
Ricardo Lobo
@rlobo 5 years ago

Some of the best visuals you will ever see in a movie. Everything else is, in my opinion, bad.

2
Bryan McClendon
@jidar 1 year ago

I'm surprised to find that I don't believe this movie holds up to modern audiences. It has some good cinematography and is good for its time, but not that watchable today. Only Kubrick fans who want to be educated on his early work should watch this. Kubricks previous movie, Paths of Glory, is a much easier recommendation and a much more reasonable length as well.

0
Recommendations
two-tone-background No results found! Please adjust your filters or try again.